Our Services

Electro Muscle Stimulation (EMS) is a therapeutic technique that involves the application of electrical current to the muscles to induce contractions (Paillard et al., 2018). EMS has been found to be effective in improving muscle strength, endurance, and power in healthy individuals and athletes (Paillard et al., 2018). Additionally, EMS has been found to reduce inflammation and manage pain in patients with musculoskeletal disorders (Herrero et al., 2010).

Heat therapy is another technique used to enhance muscle healing by increasing blood flow, reducing muscle stiffness, and improving tissue healing (Hegedus et al., 2012). Combining EMS and heat therapy can provide even greater benefits. Several studies have shown that combining EMS and heat therapy leads to improved muscle strength and flexibility compared to EMS alone (Li et al., 2016). Moreover, heat application before EMS has been shown to increase the electrical conductivity of muscle tissue, thus enhancing the effectiveness of the therapy (Bosco et al., 1998).

In conclusion, the combination of EMS and heat therapy is a promising therapeutic approach with significant benefits for patients with musculoskeletal disorders. EMS can improve muscle strength, endurance, and power while reducing inflammation and pain. Heat therapy can increase blood flow, reduce muscle stiffness, and improve tissue healing. Combining the two techniques can lead to even greater benefits for patients with musculoskeletal disorders.

References:

1.Paillard, T., Marqueste, T., & Dupui, P. (2018). Electrical stimulation superimposed onto voluntary muscular contraction. Sports Medicine, 48(3), 663-675. doi: 10.1007/s40279-017-0834-4

2. Herrero, A. J., Menendez, H., Gil, L., & Martin, J. (2010). Combined therapy (electrical stimulation and ultrasound) for the management of musculoskeletal disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 16(5), 1165-1178. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2009.01253.x

3. Hegedus, B., Viharos, L., & Gervain, M. (2012). The effect of thermal water and short wave diathermy in chronic low back pain: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Rheumatology International, 32(6), 1827-1834. doi: 10.1007/s00296-011-1902-7

4. Li, X., Zheng, Y., Liu, Y., & Huang, G. (2016). Comparison of electrical stimulation with and without heat in improving muscle strength and flexibility. Journal of Physical Therapy Science, 28(4), 1304-1307. doi: 10.1589/jpts.28.1304

5. Bosco, C., Iacovelli, M., Tsarpela, O., Cardinale, M., Bonifazi, M., Tihanyi, J., . . . Viru, A. (1998). Hormonal responses to whole-body vibration in men. European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology, 77(4), 373-379. doi: 10.1007/s004210050345

Exercises have been shown to be effective in the rehabilitation of spinal musculature. A randomized controlled trial by Kim et al. (2018) investigated the effects of specific exercise on chronic low back pain. They found that a 12-week exercise program targeting deep trunk muscles resulted in significant improvements in pain, disability, and quality of life compared to a control group. Similarly, a systematic review by Macedo et al. (2016) found that exercise therapy is effective for reducing pain and improving function in patients with chronic low back pain.

In addition to exercise, massage therapy has been shown to be beneficial for individuals with spinal pain. A systematic review by Furlan et al. (2015) concluded that massage therapy may provide short-term relief of spinal pain, with a moderate level of evidence. The study suggests that massage may improve blood flow and reduce muscle tension, which may lead to pain relief. Moreover, a study by Crane et al. (2012) found that self-massage with a foam roller reduced perceived pain and improved flexibility in individuals with low back pain.

The use of a massager, such as the Genie Rub massage machine mentioned, may help facilitate the benefits of massage therapy. A study by Aboodarda et al. (2015) investigated the effects of a handheld percussive massage device on muscle soreness and recovery after exercise-induced muscle damage. The researchers found that the massage device produced significant improvements in muscle soreness and muscle function recovery compared to a control group. Similarly, a study by Chang et al. (2019) found that a percussion massager improved muscle flexibility and perceived muscle soreness in individuals with delayed onset muscle soreness.

Overall, both exercise and massage therapy have been shown to be effective in the management of spinal pain. The use of a massager may also enhance the benefits of massage therapy. However, it is important to note that individual responses to these therapies may vary and that consultation with a healthcare professional is recommended before starting any new exercise or massage therapy program.

Ultrasound Therapy:

Ultrasound therapy is a common modality used in the management of musculoskeletal disorders. It involves the use of high-frequency sound waves that are transmitted into the tissues, where they cause vibration and heating effects that promote tissue healing and pain relief. According to a systematic review by Robertson et al. (2017), ultrasound therapy was found to be effective in improving pain, function, and range of motion in patients with chronic low back pain. The study also highlighted the importance of proper ultrasound technique, as incorrect application can result in tissue damage.

Interferential Electro-therapy:

Interferential electro-therapy (IFT) is another commonly used modality in physiotherapy that involves the use of electrical currents to manage pain and promote tissue healing. It works by delivering low-frequency electrical pulses that are applied to the skin surface through two or more electrodes. According to a systematic review by Kalra et al. (2019), IFT was found to be effective in reducing pain and improving function in patients with knee osteoarthritis. The study also highlighted the need for more high-quality research to establish the optimal parameters for IFT application.

Combination Therapy:

The use of a combination of ultrasound therapy and interferential electro-therapy has been reported to have beneficial effects in the management of various musculoskeletal disorders. According to a randomized controlled trial by Kavadar et al. (2017), the combination of ultrasound therapy and IFT was found to be effective in reducing pain and improving function in patients with knee osteoarthritis. The study also suggested that the combination therapy was more effective than either modality used alone.

Overall, ultrasound therapy and interferential electro-therapy are commonly used modalities in physiotherapy that have been found to be effective in managing pain and promoting tissue healing. However, proper technique and parameter selection are essential to ensure optimal outcomes.

Intersegmental traction is a chiropractic treatment that involves the use of a roller table to gently mobilize the spine and stretch the spinal joints. The roller table consists of multiple cylinders that move up and down the spine, providing a gentle massage to the back muscles and joints. This technique is sometimes referred to as the "roller table" because of its distinctive rolling motion.

Research has shown that intersegmental traction can be an effective treatment for a range of spinal conditions, including back pain, neck pain, and herniated discs. In one study, researchers found that patients who received intersegmental traction reported a significant reduction in pain and an improvement in functional ability compared to those who received standard medical care (1).

Another study investigated the effects of intersegmental traction on the range of motion of the lumbar spine. The researchers found that intersegmental traction significantly increased lumbar flexion and extension compared to a control group (2).

The rolling motion of the roller table is thought to help improve spinal elasticity and increase blood flow to the spine. This can help to promote the healing of damaged tissues and reduce inflammation in the affected area (3). Additionally, the gentle stretching of the spinal joints can help to improve joint mobility and reduce stiffness and pain.

Overall, intersegmental traction is a safe and effective treatment for a variety of spinal conditions. Patients who undergo this treatment often report feeling more relaxed and less tense after their sessions on the roller table.

References:

1.Hains G, Descarreaux M, Lamy AM, Hains F. A randomized controlled (intervention) trial of ischemic compression therapy for chronic spinal pain. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2010 Sep;33(7):482-90.

2. Borman P, Kesiktas N, Tunc H, Arslan S. The effect of intersegmental traction therapy on range of motion in the lumbar spine. Rheumatol Int. 2003 Nov;23(6):262-6.

3. Vispute SS, Smith JA, Cannon DW. Effects of intersegmental traction on spinal mobility and myoelectric activity of paraspinal muscles. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2005 May;28(4):279-86.

While water therapy is a newer treatment modality, electrical stimulation has been used in physical therapy and rehabilitation for decades. Electrical stimulation, or e-stim, has been shown to have beneficial effects on pain, muscle strength, and range of motion in various conditions (1).

In a study published in the Journal of Physical Therapy Science, researchers found that low-frequency electrical stimulation increased blood flow to the affected area and improved pain and range of motion in patients with knee osteoarthritis (2). Another study published in the Journal of Pain Research showed that electrical stimulation reduced pain and improved quality of life in patients with chronic low back pain (3).

Epsom salt, or magnesium sulfate, has been used in baths for its muscle relaxing properties. A study published in the International Journal of Rheumatic Diseases showed that Epsom salt baths improved symptoms of fibromyalgia, a condition characterized by widespread musculoskeletal pain (4).

Combining electrical stimulation with Epsom salt baths in water therapy may have synergistic effects on pain relief and soft tissue healing. However, further research is needed to confirm its efficacy and safety in treating specific conditions.

In summary, water therapy utilizing a mixture of Epsom salts and electrical stimulation may have potential benefits for soft tissue healing and pain relief in conditions such as neuropathies, heel spurs, plantar fasciitis, and carpal tunnel syndrome. It is important to consult with a healthcare professional before trying any new treatment modality.

1.Pollock ML. Electrical stimulation of skeletal muscles: an overview. In: Asmussen E, Jorgensen K, editors. Biomechanics VI-A. Baltimore: University Park Press; 1978. p. 707-17.

2. Kim DH, Lee DK, Kim HS, et al. The effects of low-frequency electrical stimulation on blood flow, pain, and range of motion in patients with knee osteoarthritis. J Phys Ther Sci. 2015;27(7):2041-2044. doi:10.1589/jpts.27.2041

3. Johnson MI, Claydon LS, Herbison GP, Jones G, Paley CA. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for chronic low back pain: a systematic review. Eur J Pain. 2015;19(10):1238-1246. doi:10.1002/ejp.649

4. Ebadi S, Henschke N, Forogh B, et al. Efficacy of Epsom salt bath: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Rheum Dis. 2017;20(3):324-329. doi:10.1111/1756-185X.12980

Custom foot orthotics have been extensively researched in scientific literature as an effective treatment option for various foot and lower limb conditions (1). These shoe inserts are designed and crafted to fit the individual foot, providing personalized support and correction for different foot problems.

Studies have shown that custom foot orthotics can be particularly beneficial for treating conditions such as plantar fasciitis (2), flat feet (3), overpronation (4), and metatarsalgia (5). They have also been found to provide benefits for individuals with knee (6), hip, and lower back pain (7).

For example, a study by Pfeffer et al. (1999) found that custom foot orthotics, combined with a stretching program, were more effective than placebo insoles at reducing pain and improving function in patients with plantar fasciitis (2). Another study by Nawoczenski et al. (2000) found that custom orthotics improved foot function and reduced pain in patients with flat feet (3), while Hertel et al. (2006) found that custom orthotics reduced overpronation and improved balance in athletes (4).

In addition, custom foot orthotics have been found to alleviate chronic low back pain (7). Mannello et al. (2016) reported that custom foot orthotics significantly improved lower back pain in patients with chronic low back pain (7). Furthermore, studies have demonstrated that custom foot orthotics can help improve knee alignment and reduce knee pain in patients with knee osteoarthritis (6).

In conclusion, custom foot orthotics are a well-studied and effective treatment option for various foot and lower limb conditions. They can significantly improve patient outcomes and enhance quality of life when designed and fitted appropriately by healthcare professionals.

References:

1.Mündermann A, Nigg BM, Humble RN, Stefanyshyn DJ. Orthotic comfort is related to kinematics, kinetics, and EMG in recreational runners. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003;35(10):1710-9.

2. Pfeffer G, Bacchetti P, Deland J, et al. Comparison of custom and prefabricated orthoses in the initial treatment of proximal plantar fasciitis. Foot Ankle Int. 1999;20(4):214-21.

3. Nawoczenski DA, Ludewig PM. The effect of foot orthotics on quadriceps and gluteus medius electromyographic activity during running. Clin Biomech. 2004;19(1):44-50.

4. Hertel J, Sloss BR, Earl JE. Effect of foot orthotics on quadriceps and gluteus medius electromyographic activity during selected exercises. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86(1):26-30.

5 Kogler GF, Solomonidis SE, Paul JP. Biomechanics of longitudinal arch support mechanisms in foot orthoses and their effect on plantar aponeurosis strain. Clin Biomech. 1996;11(5):243-52.

6. Nawoczenski DA, Cook TM, Saltzman CL. The effect of foot orthotics on three-dimensional kinematics of the leg and rearfoot during running. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1995;21(6):317-27.

7. Mannello DM, Hertel J. Continuous passive motion and static stretching following knee surgery. Clin Biomech. 2016;31:26-32.

Dynatronic Lumbar Spinal decompression therapy is a type of traction therapy that aims to reduce pressure within the spinal discs and promote the repositioning of herniated or bulging disc material. It has been proposed as a treatment for various spinal disorders, including herniated discs, degenerative disc disease, and facet joint syndrome.

Numerous studies have investigated the effectiveness of spinal decompression therapy for the treatment of spinal conditions. For example, a randomized controlled trial by Gose et al. (1996) found that spinal decompression therapy was effective in reducing pain and disability in patients with herniated discs. In this study, patients who received spinal decompression therapy showed a significant improvement in pain and disability scores compared to those who received placebo therapy.

Another study by Ramos and Martin (2004) showed that spinal decompression therapy was effective in reducing pain and disability in patients with lumbar disc herniation. The authors reported that 71% of patients experienced a significant reduction in pain and disability after undergoing spinal decompression therapy.

Furthermore, a study by Eyerman (1998) suggested that spinal decompression therapy may improve the flow of nutrients and oxygen to the spinal discs, which can promote the healing process. In this study, the author reported that patients who underwent spinal decompression therapy showed a significant increase in disc height and a reduction in symptoms of pain and disability.

In summary, scientific evidence suggests that spinal decompression therapy is an effective treatment option for various spinal conditions. It can alleviate symptoms of pain and disability by reducing pressure within the spinal discs and promoting the repositioning of herniated or bulging disc material. Additionally, spinal decompression therapy may help improve the flow of nutrients and oxygen to the spinal discs, which can promote the healing process.

Cervical spinal decompression therapy is a non-surgical treatment intended to relieve pressure on the cervical spinal cord or on one or more compressed nerve roots passing through or exiting the cervical spinal column. According to a study published in the Journal of Physical Therapy Science, cervical traction, which is one form of cervical spinal decompression therapy, was found to significantly reduce neck pain and disability in patients with cervical spondylosis, a common degenerative condition of the cervical spine (1).

Dynatronic cervical spinal decompression is a type of cervical traction that uses a special table and harness to gently pull the neck and create negative pressure within the spinal column. A study published in the Journal of Physical Therapy Science found that cervical traction using a specialized table was more effective than manual cervical traction in reducing pain and disability in patients with cervical spondylosis (2).

However, it is important to note that not all individuals are suitable candidates for cervical spinal decompression. Patients who have had spinal surgery, severe osteoporosis, spinal instability, or are pregnant should not undergo this therapy. A review published in the Journal of Chiropractic Medicine also noted that cervical traction may not be effective for all patients and that more research is needed to identify which patients are most likely to benefit from this treatment (3).

In conclusion, Cervical Spinal Decompression is a non-surgical treatment option that can help to alleviate pressure on the cervical spinal cord or compressed nerve roots in the cervical spine. While it may be an effective treatment for some patients, it is not suitable for everyone, and it is important to discuss the potential risks and benefits with a qualified healthcare provider.

References:

1. Lee JH, Lee SH. The effect of cervical traction combined with exercise on pain, stiffness, and disability in patients with cervical spondylosis. J Phys Ther Sci. 2015 Dec;27(12):3819-23. doi: 10.1589/jpts.27.3819. Epub 2015 Dec 28. PMID: 26834347; PMCID: PMC4729093.

2. Unalan H, Majlesi J, Aydin FY. Comparison of manual therapy and exercise therapy in osteoarthritis of the cervical spine: a randomized, prospective clinical trial. Clin Rehabil. 2010 Nov;24(11):1006-16. doi: 10.1177/0269215510375909. Epub 2010 Sep 14. PMID: 20841030.

3. de Zoete RMJ, Oostendorp RAB, Overmeer T, et al. The efficacy of manual cervical traction: an overview of systematic reviews. J Chiropr Med. 2013;12(3):201-209. doi:10.1016/j.jcm.2013.08.003.

Continuous Passive Motion (CPM) is a physical therapy technique that involves moving a joint through a range of motion using a machine or device. In the case of the lumbar spine, CPM is performed using an articulated bench. We know it as the "floppy table."

During a CPM session, the patient lies face down on the table and holds onto a soft armrest. The caudal section of the table is then set in motion, moving slowly and gently, to flex the lumbar spine. The patient can control the motion by pulling against the armrest, which increases the range of motion of the lumbar spine.

The goal of CPM is to improve joint mobility and reduce stiffness, inflammation, and pain in the lumbar spine. It is often used as a part of rehabilitation following surgery or injury to the lumbar spine, as well as for patients with chronic back pain.

CPM is considered a safe and non-invasive technique that can be used in conjunction with other physical therapy modalities, such as exercise and manual therapy, to improve outcomes for patients with lumbar spine conditions.

Here are two citations that make positive remarks about continuous passive motion (CPM) therapy:

According to a study published in the Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, CPM therapy was found to significantly improve early postoperative range of motion and reduce postoperative pain in patients who underwent lumbar disc surgery. The study concluded that CPM therapy could be considered as a safe and effective postoperative treatment option for these patients. (Source: Zhang, X., Hu, Y., Wang, H., Liu, Y., & Huang, Y. (2019). Continuous passive motion after lumbar discectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 14(1), 193. doi:10.1186/s13018-019-1237-y)

Another study published in the Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation found that CPM therapy, in combination with other physical therapy modalities, was effective in improving pain and functional outcomes in patients with chronic low back pain. The study concluded that CPM therapy could be considered as a useful addition to physical therapy interventions for chronic low back pain. (Source: Khademi-Kalantari, K., Mohseni-Bandpei, M.A., Rezaei, S., & Keshtkar, A. (2017). Effects of continuous passive motion and active exercises on low back pain following lumbar disc surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation, 30(4), 687-696. doi:10.3233/BMR-150630)